News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


Risking lives

Risking lives Risking lives

THE lives of Dudley residents will be put at risk, claim firefighters, as the town’s fire station gets set to lose two of its engines.

Firefighters at the Burton Road station are up in arms over costcutting plans by West Midlands Fire Service to replace one of its main appliances and its technical rescue vehicle with a Range Rover at the end of the month.

The Fire Brigades Union claims the move would also put jobs at risk.

Firefighters were informed in December about the 12-month trial with the new brigade response vehicle (BRV) – a specially kitted out Range Rover which will attend small fires and less serious incidents.

However crews at the station argue the BRV will only increase dangers, as it carries less kit and a lesser number of crew – with space for just three.

Chris Downes, West Midlands Regional FBU secretary, said: “This is a minimalistic approach to firefighting.

“They will only be able to carry a small amount of kit and will have to make do with what they have.

“Firefighter safety is being compromised, as well as public safety.

“We have evidence that the Range Rover cannot effectively deal with fires.

“When trying to put out a car fire, the fire kept igniting. It was only successful when dealing with a single tyre fire.”

The latest cut by WMFS comes just weeks after the decision to decommission Halesowen Fire Station.

Halesowen is set to close in March with the loss of another fire engine, leaving Brierley Hill, Stourbridge, Cradley Heath and Dudley’s one engine to cover the entire borough.

Mr Downes added: “Dudley Borough is taking one hell of a hit at the moment.

“We should be asking what has the borough done to receive a downgrade in emergency cover and will the people of Dudley be getting a rebate on Council Tax as the service the Fire Service will be operating will be greatly reduced.”

The plans have also been criticised by campaigners who fought to save Sedgley Fire Station, which closed in 2009, after assurances the areawould be covered by appliances from Dudley.

Rachel Spittle,who headed the Sedgley fight, said: “It is recognised by everyone that the economic climate is not good at present, but West Midlands Fire Service are jumping on the bandwagon to use it as an excuse when it really isn’t needed.

“I have no doubt this service hasn’t got its pressures like others, but I don’t agree with cutting more appliances and TRV's to meet such savings.

“Why do the Fire Service not acknowledge that a retained service is the most cost effective way of providing the same full professional service that is offered at a whole time station.”

Confirming trials will take also take place in Tipton and Coventry, a West Midlands Fire Service spokesman, said: “Analysis of incident data from the last three years tells us that in many cases, a traditional fire engine isn’t needed to respond to an incident.

“In 2011, we began trialling the use of a specialist Range Rover to respond to false alarm calls in city centres across the West Midlands.

“This not only demonstrated a cost saving, but also ensured that our traditional fire engines were always available to respond to incidents where specialist fire and rescue support was required.

“The speed and flexibility of the specialist vehicles should enable us to provide a faster and more effective response to fires like those involving rubbish.

“It also means that our fleet of traditional fire engines will be better able respond primarily to larger scale incidents where more resources are required.”

What do you think about the cutbacks at Dudley Fire Station? Let us know by posting a comment below.

Comments(4)

ukip-halesowen says...
11:47am Thu 12 Jan 12

It is a disgrace that the service is cutting its service so much and putting lives of the public and firefighters at risk. How can this new vehicle get to incidents any quicker than a normal appliance as the brigade has a speed policy its drivers have to stick to so it will only be able to go at same speed.

davros1977 says...
9:24pm Thu 12 Jan 12

Okay, so after over 37 years of the best Fire cover in the world, some tech guy has studied 'statistics' and decided that although 37 years ago we needed 2 Fire Engines, 1 turntable Ladder, and a Rescue Tender LandRover, in Dudley,but now we can manage with just 1 Fire Engine and 1 Landrover: And 2 Fire Engines in Halesowen but now we can get rid of both, and close the Fire Station! Why? Has the population decreased? No it has increased by over 35%. Have the risks gone away? No, in fact with the increased diverse industries, the increase of vehicles on the motorway and across the borough, the cuts that mean people will be taking short cuts with heating methods and with safety measures, the risks have increased. Who in their crazy minds decided to take Fire Engines away from the community who pay their taxes for protection by the Fire Service? Who gave some administrative technical guy in uniform the responsibility of placing Dudley or Halesowen at risk? Answer it is a very incompetent Fire Authority whose consideration is just the budget and not us residents. It is about time that the Fire-fighters were given the support they deserve from us, the community they serve. Don't just sit and read about an action like this, a 'trial' for 12 months? When we need those Fire Engines in the dead of night or during a huge storm, or a building collapse they will not be there ,Write to your local paper, contact your local MP and save yourself some sleepless nights, because sooner or later, one day or one night, you will need their help, you will need them to put their life on the line to save you, and guess what? When they didn't, couldn't or weren't able to get to you in time...who do you think will be on the TV saying how sorry they were? the same management person who supported the cuts, well it did save money didn't it, never mind about life!
So come on somebody out there, I do know what a real Fire Service was like, I spent 27 years as a Fire-fighter and 19 of them in the Black country. These fire-fighters are the product of a long history of tradition and courageous service to the community, but because we are now a 'Community Fire Service', and they all serve in a "Community Fire Station', and the Fire Officers are all 'Managers' now, then the Fire Service is being treated as just another business. The cuts are all being carried out for financial efficiency and not for the sake and safety of us, the residents who should be protected. No-one can forecast just where and when a fire, or a disaster, or an incident or an accident will happen, but with nearly a million people in this Borough many from other countries, the risks are increasing, and some idiot decides to save money....not lives. they should hang their heads in shame, and find another job, because anyone who approves cutting Fire Engines from the Fire Stations, or even closing Fire Stations is not a Firefighter, they are just office managers, and God help us when we get the next big fire. Amen to the Fire-fighters who are being let down by their own service management.

patriotic citizen says...
10:23am Fri 13 Jan 12

I spent three months of 1977 in Ladywood covering for striking fireman, it is only then or if you have needed the services of WMFS that you start to appreciate these guys and the importance of their job. as an RAF firefighter i quickly became aware of the difference between our respective roles putting out an aircraft fire and rescuing a pilot was a breeze in comparison to recovering the bodies of three children after putting out a house fire something that still haunts me today. dont wait untill you need their help and they're not there do as davros says write to your MP organise a protest march

dudley old boy says...
1:36pm Fri 13 Jan 12

during the trial period we are to be issued with a bucket of sand just in case a fire breaks out

click2find

Most popular