Get involved! Send your photos, video, news & views by texting DN NEWS to 80360 or e-mail us
11:40pm Sunday 2nd May 2010 in Local
REPORTS are coming in that the English Defence League has occupied the rooftop of a derelict building in Dudley earmarked for a mammoth new mosque.
The group staged a daytime protest in the town on Easter Saturday to show their objection to the planned new place of worship - and almost immediately afterwards supporters said a return visit was already being planned.
Around 20 EDL members, with their faces covered, are reportedly involved in the protest, which has been advertised on the group's page on social networking site Facebook.
An eyewitness said: "They're waving England flags and blaring out Islamic music from a loud speaker."
The EDL's website says the protestors "have food and water to last them weeks, and a pa system to give speeches".
It adds: "I believe they even have a Playstation. They will be playing the call to prayer to let those who are not bothered by this mosque know what to look forward to."
Police and fire crews - however - have arrived at the scene and sealed off Hall Street in the hope of achieving a swift end to the protest.
Comments(101)
CTH
says...
12:21am Mon 3 May 10
Volkl
says...
12:38am Mon 3 May 10
United Shades of Britain
says...
12:53am Mon 3 May 10
Potsworth
says...
1:06am Mon 3 May 10
United Shades of Britain
says...
1:09am Mon 3 May 10
Road_Hog
says...
1:17am Mon 3 May 10
United Shades of Britain
says...
1:22am Mon 3 May 10
Potsworth
says...
1:24am Mon 3 May 10
United Shades of Britain
says...
1:28am Mon 3 May 10
YORKIE68
says...
1:30am Mon 3 May 10
United Shades of Britain
says...
1:34am Mon 3 May 10
Potsworth
says...
1:50am Mon 3 May 10
Road_Hog
says...
1:52am Mon 3 May 10
United Shades of Britain
says...
1:57am Mon 3 May 10
United Shades of Britain
says...
1:58am Mon 3 May 10
United Shades of Britain
says...
2:00am Mon 3 May 10
YORKIE68
says...
2:00am Mon 3 May 10
United Shades of Britain
says...
2:03am Mon 3 May 10
CTH
says...
2:06am Mon 3 May 10
United Shades of Britain
says...
2:07am Mon 3 May 10
CTH
says...
2:12am Mon 3 May 10
United Shades of Britain
says...
2:20am Mon 3 May 10
jabz_ali
says...
2:20am Mon 3 May 10
bat3man
says...
2:26am Mon 3 May 10
CTH
says...
2:28am Mon 3 May 10
United Shades of Britain
says...
2:28am Mon 3 May 10
United Shades of Britain
says...
2:29am Mon 3 May 10
bat3man
says...
2:36am Mon 3 May 10
United Shades of Britain
says...
2:48am Mon 3 May 10
Potsworth
says...
3:16am Mon 3 May 10
Donna Mortimer
says...
8:08am Mon 3 May 10
United Shades of Britain wrote:Not all muslims are terrorist BUT most terrorist are Islamic . Fact..
@CTH The things is the EDL are trying to make out that Islamic extremists are the only threat to this country, when in actual fact, there have been far more bombings from the IRA in this country in recent years. If you look at Europol stats, Islamic extremism is quite far down on the list, compared to other terrorists. And if the EDL protest Islamic extremism, why are they harassing KFC staff about halal meat? Why are they wanting to ban the burkha? Why are they wanting no mosques? Basically, to the EDL, if you're a Muslim in this country, the only way you can follow your religion is if you don't eat what you want to eat, you don't wear what you want to wear, or pray in a place of worship appropriate to your religion.
seanburi
says...
8:42am Mon 3 May 10
Lisalashesxxx
says...
8:52am Mon 3 May 10
HayleyUSoB
says...
8:53am Mon 3 May 10
Donna Mortimer
says...
9:08am Mon 3 May 10
seanburi wrote:Education is the ket here Sean.
@bat3man "The EDL are the only ones truly fighting for this country..." Tell that to all our brave soldiers who are really fighting and sacrificing their lives for us, the EDL are nothing more than a rabble of football hooligans & racist thugs, stay on the roof forever, nobody will miss you.
Donna Mortimer
says...
9:14am Mon 3 May 10
HayleyUSoB
says...
9:17am Mon 3 May 10
Lisalashesxxx
says...
9:20am Mon 3 May 10
seanburi
says...
9:36am Mon 3 May 10
Lisalashesxxx
says...
9:55am Mon 3 May 10
seanburi
says...
10:00am Mon 3 May 10
Lisalashesxxx
says...
10:10am Mon 3 May 10
SimonGB
says...
10:13am Mon 3 May 10
almikey
says...
10:22am Mon 3 May 10
almikey
says...
10:25am Mon 3 May 10
SimonGB wrote:The BNP are against sharia law, right? So how come what you propose as a legal system is just as bonkers.
@seanburi, the EDL are not the only ones fighting for this country, there is the BNP, i should know, i am a member! USoB is performing TAQIYYA, an on-purpose complete denial of any knowledge of muslims wishing to rule our great country!
Donna Mortimer
says...
10:31am Mon 3 May 10
Donna Mortimer
says...
10:40am Mon 3 May 10
seanburi wrote:lol u think you know them very well..
I know the EDL very well thank you, the security services in this country do a great job of protecting us, if we really needed a bunch of weekend warriors to save us it wouldn't be the EDL, one only has to look at any of their facebook groups to see the racism and xenophobia on display, as to opening my eyes they are open and they see straight through you and your hatred.
Lisalashesxxx
says...
10:43am Mon 3 May 10
jabz_ali
says...
11:03am Mon 3 May 10
jabz_ali
says...
11:06am Mon 3 May 10
almikey
says...
11:09am Mon 3 May 10
Lisalashesxxx wrote:My main point, if you had an attention span greater than a 4 year-old was that the UK society is more a threat to Islam than Islam is, and the attempts by the imams to prevent this can be seen in the expansion of mosques and faith schools. So my point still stands.
sorry almikey I think I dropped off reading your post. You seem a tad confused, I don't believe i actually mentioned Sharia Law anywhere....and yes, a rave. That will really get things moving won't it....bit hungover are we dear? Go back to sleep then come back and try to patronise me again :)
Lisalashesxxx
says...
11:14am Mon 3 May 10
United Shades of Britain
says...
11:20am Mon 3 May 10
HayleyUSoB
says...
11:23am Mon 3 May 10
jabz_ali
says...
11:25am Mon 3 May 10
JamesSt
says...
11:30am Mon 3 May 10
United Shades of Britain
says...
11:31am Mon 3 May 10
Lisalashesxxx
says...
11:33am Mon 3 May 10
Lisalashesxxx
says...
11:36am Mon 3 May 10
United Shades of Britain
says...
11:36am Mon 3 May 10
jabz_ali
says...
11:39am Mon 3 May 10
Lisalashesxxx
says...
11:40am Mon 3 May 10
jabz_ali
says...
11:41am Mon 3 May 10
Lisalashesxxx
says...
11:42am Mon 3 May 10
Lisalashesxxx
says...
11:43am Mon 3 May 10
United Shades of Britain
says...
11:49am Mon 3 May 10
Lisalashesxxx
says...
11:51am Mon 3 May 10
jabz_ali
says...
11:53am Mon 3 May 10
United Shades of Britain
says...
11:55am Mon 3 May 10
jabz_ali
says...
12:11pm Mon 3 May 10
Harbi
says...
1:02pm Mon 3 May 10
United Shades of Britain
says...
1:13pm Mon 3 May 10
Harbi
says...
1:20pm Mon 3 May 10
United Shades of Britain wrote:USoB logic would certainly suggest so. Which is why you like to tar ALL edl members with the same brush.
@harbi So because of a few nutters ALL muslims have to suffer?
EDL showing their true colours with this protest.
robsbritish country
says...
1:31pm Mon 3 May 10
robsbritish country
says...
1:31pm Mon 3 May 10
Harbi
says...
1:50pm Mon 3 May 10
robsbritish country wrote:@robsbritish, this is not about black white or Indian. Posting such a comment just makes you sound ignorant.
i am from dudley,i am not racist and alot of white people are not racists but we have had enough of whats happening to our country! you come to england,you get houses,money,the best of everything,and you get t o do what ever you want! could we go to india and do what ever we wanted? could we build a church? could we get a nice house? we would be slaughted! maybe there was only 22,000 people what signed against the mosque and maybe there is 194,919 people live in dudley......could all these be blacks,muslims,india
ns? cause lets face it,there aint many white people in dudley are there? the edl are standing up for the british people,the only ones with balls.and i take my hat off to them!
robsbritish country
says...
2:07pm Mon 3 May 10
Harbi
says...
2:48pm Mon 3 May 10
Aynuck
says...
3:21pm Mon 3 May 10
TOM THE CABIN BOY
says...
3:28pm Mon 3 May 10
United Shades of Britain wrote:the EDL protest Islamic extremism, why are they harassing KFC staff about halal meat? Glad to see you are asking questions. Why should everyone else have to eat Halal because at the moment everything points that way, IMO KFC dropped a clanger and I would urge everyone who isnt moslem to boycott the place, let them see profits fall and outlets shut down There is news that the biggest Halal meat processing plant is been considered in S Wales. As a minority why should the majority have to do the bidding of Islam Why are they wanting to ban the burkha? As we have seen in the past the Burka has been used to avoid arrest by Islamic terrorist and other crimminals to say nothing about the abuse of women Bash em Bruise em cover it up with a burka Why are they wanting no mosques? The Channel 4 documentary made it public the message delivered in the Mosque you cant deny it. As a minotity just how many Mosques do you need. The PM of Turkey stated that the mosques are our barracks etc Google PM ERDOGAN Basically, to the EDL, if you're a Muslim in this country, the only way you can follow your religion is if you don't eat what you want to eat, you don't wear what you want to wear, or pray in a place of worship appropriate to your religion.
@CTH The things is the EDL are trying to make out that Islamic extremists are the only threat to this country, when in actual fact, there have been far more bombings from the IRA in this country in recent years. If you look at Europol stats, Islamic extremism is quite far down on the list, compared to other terrorists. And if the EDL protest Islamic extremism, why are they harassing KFC staff about halal meat? Why are they wanting to ban the burkha? Why are they wanting no mosques? Basically, to the EDL, if you're a Muslim in this country, the only way you can follow your religion is if you don't eat what you want to eat, you don't wear what you want to wear, or pray in a place of worship appropriate to your religion.
robsbritish country
says...
4:24pm Mon 3 May 10
1MU
says...
6:01pm Mon 3 May 10
Bigland
says...
7:26pm Mon 3 May 10
Aynuck
says...
7:35pm Mon 3 May 10
1MU wrote:That's correct but a legitimate protest or discussion could not be construed as inciting racial or religious hatred.
@ Donna Mortimer.
"Islam is not a race its a religion so therefor your calls of us being racist are meaningless."
So you admit that what you say would be deemed racist if Muslims were actually a race. That's an admission that you think you can say things of a racist nature, but direct them at a religion instead. Unfortunately for you you are wrong. The law categorises hatred against people on religious grounds in the same category as hatred against people on racial grounds.
http://en.wikipedia.
org/wiki/Racial_and_
Religious_Hatred_Act
_2006
The Racial and Religious Hatred Act 2006 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom (citation 2006 c. 1) which creates an offence in England and Wales of inciting hatred against a person on the grounds of their religion.
As it's an extension on the same piece of legislation that bans inciting racial hatred, legally speaking inciting hatred against Muslims is the same as racism.
1MU
says...
7:38pm Mon 3 May 10
1MU
says...
7:48pm Mon 3 May 10
Bigland wrote:Not at all, they are both almost identical only one is directed at race and the other at religion. Why is it more moral to say that 'Muslims are taking over and are scum' than it is to say 'Asians are taking over and are scum'? If one is somehow better than the other as it isn't to do with a particular form of human category, then hatred becomes a game where hatred is only bad if it's racial. Attacking Muslims really is a proxy form of racism as EDL members frequently refer to 'Pakis' as well as 'muzzies'. In the end it means the same, but they think they can get away with it. What Donna has just demonstrated is that attacking Muslims is a way of being racist, but being able to say it doesn't count.
That's bizarre logic, 1MU. On those grounds, pineapple chunks are the same as ham because you can find them both on the same pizza.
1MU
says...
8:10pm Mon 3 May 10
Aynuck wrote:The EDL spend all their protesting against Muslims though, specifically in ways and locations that actually incite racial hatred. Muslims see it as an attack on them, so the EDL are inciting racial hatred and race riots (most of the Muslims will probably be Asian anyway).
1MU wrote:That's correct but a legitimate protest or discussion could not be construed as inciting racial or religious hatred.
@ Donna Mortimer.
"Islam is not a race its a religion so therefor your calls of us being racist are meaningless."
So you admit that what you say would be deemed racist if Muslims were actually a race. That's an admission that you think you can say things of a racist nature, but direct them at a religion instead. Unfortunately for you you are wrong. The law categorises hatred against people on religious grounds in the same category as hatred against people on racial grounds.
http://en.wikipedia.
org/wiki/Racial_and_
Religious_Hatred_Act
_2006
The Racial and Religious Hatred Act 2006 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom (citation 2006 c. 1) which creates an offence in England and Wales of inciting hatred against a person on the grounds of their religion.
As it's an extension on the same piece of legislation that bans inciting racial hatred, legally speaking inciting hatred against Muslims is the same as racism.
The oft overplayed race card has been used far too many times as a tool to stifle debate and to overrule the wishes of the majority of the people who live here.
Was the Muslim who defaced the war memorial with pro Islamist graffiti charged with inciting racial hatred?
Muslims can't have it both ways, they can't demand the freedom to protest for themselves whilst denying it to every non Muslim who disagrees with them.
Aynuck
says...
8:17pm Mon 3 May 10
1MU wrote:Muslims frequently refer to non Muslims as 'kaffirs'.
Bigland wrote:Not at all, they are both almost identical only one is directed at race and the other at religion. Why is it more moral to say that 'Muslims are taking over and are scum' than it is to say 'Asians are taking over and are scum'? If one is somehow better than the other as it isn't to do with a particular form of human category, then hatred becomes a game where hatred is only bad if it's racial. Attacking Muslims really is a proxy form of racism as EDL members frequently refer to 'Pakis' as well as 'muzzies'. In the end it means the same, but they think they can get away with it. What Donna has just demonstrated is that attacking Muslims is a way of being racist, but being able to say it doesn't count.
That's bizarre logic, 1MU. On those grounds, pineapple chunks are the same as ham because you can find them both on the same pizza.
Aynuck
says...
8:51pm Mon 3 May 10
Bigland
says...
9:23pm Mon 3 May 10
1MU wrote:Then call it religious hatred, because it isn't racism. Not all Asians are Muslims and not all Muslims are Asian ("most" is not "all").
Bigland wrote:Not at all, they are both almost identical only one is directed at race and the other at religion. Why is it more moral to say that 'Muslims are taking over and are scum' than it is to say 'Asians are taking over and are scum'? If one is somehow better than the other as it isn't to do with a particular form of human category, then hatred becomes a game where hatred is only bad if it's racial. Attacking Muslims really is a proxy form of racism as EDL members frequently refer to 'Pakis' as well as 'muzzies'. In the end it means the same, but they think they can get away with it. What Donna has just demonstrated is that attacking Muslims is a way of being racist, but being able to say it doesn't count.
That's bizarre logic, 1MU. On those grounds, pineapple chunks are the same as ham because you can find them both on the same pizza.
hoplite1766
says...
9:49pm Mon 3 May 10
Free Agent
says...
5:31am Tue 4 May 10
robsbritish country
says...
10:31am Tue 4 May 10
Southport Squadron
says...
2:04pm Tue 4 May 10
United Shades of Britain wrote:i think the people of Dudley will have been greatfull for the disruption as long as it helps promote their plight. i would also say that 22,000 signatures on a list is a majority and not a minority. 22k said NO yet the council has gone ahead and done what it pleases. EDL NO SURRENDER. proud of you lads down their.
How the EDL thinks this will help their credibility is beyond me. After yesterday's demo, in a town where nobody wanted them, their popularity is pretty low right now. And disrupting people on a Sunday night, no thought to the elderly or children, or anyone trying to sleep whilst blaring out music. Haven't they disrupted enough people this weekend?
robsbritish country
says...
4:33pm Tue 4 May 10
spud edl
says...
5:50pm Wed 5 May 10
United Shades of Britain
says...
11:44pm Wed 5 May 10
robsbritish country
says...
1:06pm Thu 6 May 10
firkin
says...
9:11pm Wed 12 May 10
Free Agent
says...
1:51am Thu 13 May 10
Find your next job now in the West Midlands
Search Now »
Make a date in the West Midlands Now!
Search Now »
Homes for sale and to let in the West Midlands
Search Now »
Cars for sale throughout the West Midlands
Search Now »
Road_Hog says...
12:17am Mon 3 May 10